Transcribed by Bert.
[February 6, 2016 Part 2 (49:14 mark)]:
Caller: Intent without thought has been having some significant “affects” and “effects” for me recently. And this sneezing that I go through, and intent without thought seems to be linked, iON. There's some Non-Physical here, can you describe for me that link?
iON: It's the difference between “intention” and “deliberate intention” - deliberate intention includes thought.
Caller: And, the corollary of that is that the other intent doesn't require thought.
iON: Correct, and there's no action you take that changes it. But then, in the other way, it just dissipates and goes away on its own.
Caller: And as it says in the Bible: “The Father in Heaven knows your thoughts before you do".
iON: The thinking thought that's thunk! So, if you knew in the future what your thoughts are going to think - that thinking thought must have thought that you would think it. Otherwise, the thinking thought couldn't thunk! Yes?
Caller: Therefore, thought is not required for intent.
iON: It certainly is not a “thinking man's game"! Good!
[February 6, 2016 Part 2 (49:14 mark)]:
Caller: Intent without thought has been having some significant “affects” and “effects” for me recently. And this sneezing that I go through, and intent without thought seems to be linked, iON. There's some Non-Physical here, can you describe for me that link?
iON: It's the difference between “intention” and “deliberate intention” - deliberate intention includes thought.
Caller: And, the corollary of that is that the other intent doesn't require thought.
iON: Correct, and there's no action you take that changes it. But then, in the other way, it just dissipates and goes away on its own.
Caller: And as it says in the Bible: “The Father in Heaven knows your thoughts before you do".
iON: The thinking thought that's thunk! So, if you knew in the future what your thoughts are going to think - that thinking thought must have thought that you would think it. Otherwise, the thinking thought couldn't thunk! Yes?
Caller: Therefore, thought is not required for intent.
iON: It certainly is not a “thinking man's game"! Good!
No comments:
Post a Comment