Monday, March 25, 2019

The OA Part II

More interdimensional travel to other versions of the self. Filmed in Oakland & San Francisco.

Matt Taibbi & Jordan Chariton on Russiagate Reporting

Bob Dobbs, “This Is Perhaps the Best Article on Russiagate, Yet”

It’s official: Russiagate is this generation’s WMD

by Matt Taibbi

Nobody wants to hear this, but news that Special Prosecutor Robert Mueller is headed home without issuing new charges is a death-blow for the reputation of the American news media.

As has long been rumored, the former FBI chief’s independent probe will result in multiple indictments and convictions, but no “presidency-wrecking” conspiracy charges, or anything that would meet the layman’s definition of “collusion” with Russia.

With the caveat that even this news might somehow turn out to be botched, the key detail in the many stories about the end of the Mueller investigation was best expressed by the New York Times:

A senior Justice Department official said that Mr. Mueller would not recommend new indictments.

Attorney General William Barr sent a letter to congress summarizing Mueller’s conclusions. The money line quoted the Mueller report:

[T]he investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.

Continue reading at

Sunday, March 24, 2019

iON | FOREX Formula


ReWrite 20
9 March 2011 Part 1, 2, 3

ReWrite 22
23 March 2011

The New Coach House

3 February 2011, Session 295
3 March 2011, Session 319a, Session 319b
15 March 2011, Session 325
22 March 2011, Session 329
5 April 2011, Session 342
15 April 2011, Session 351
21 April 2011, Session 357
28 April 2011, Session 363
19 May 2011, Session 375
26 May 2011, Session 381
2 June 2011, Session 390
9 June 2011, Session 396
16 June 2011, Session 402
30 June 2011, Session 418
7 July 2011, Session 424
28 July 2011, Session 439a, Session 439b
4 August 2011, Session 446a, Session 446b
11 August 2011, Session 452
17 November 2011, Session 513
26 March 2011, Session 332
31 March 2011, Session 337
12 April 2011, Session 347
1 May 2011, Session 366
14 May 2011, Session 373
28 May 2011, Session 386

Saturday, March 23, 2019

The New Coach House

The New Coach House

“On July 29 [2017] I began to release the amazing new documents from my McLuhan File that have never been heard or seen before. Don't miss them if you’re interested in new territory scoped out in the McLuhan Quadrant …”
Bob Dobbs


Part 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
23 March

Part 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
16 March

Part 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
9 March

Part 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
2 March

Part 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
23 February

Part 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
16 February

iON | WIFI & the Cloud

Transcribed by Bert.


[18 October 2014, Part 1]:

(1:13:37 mark)
Caller 1: When you were talking about the portals and wormholes, I’ve never heard this before, you mentioned WIFI and data.

iON: Yes, the cloud.

Caller 1: So, which goes with which? Are Portals with WIFI?

iON: No! No! No! No, it’s not a singular thing. Those are applications within the cloud, 1 & 0, Fortran, COBOL back in your day - COBOL, Fortran. Those are split in devices into a code. The code comes into the way carbon applies to storage information. Storage information applies to WIFI, from everything from a WIFI system. Everything must be WIFI because that’s how you reach the cloud. Even your cellular technology now is all going to be made to be WIFI and that way you can listen to your conversation in your "Man Cave" as it were. So, WIFI is more permeable, and so, therefore, data comes on a data transcript through WIFI. WIFI applies to how the cloud erupts and will move. The cloud of glory is moving, move with the cloud.

Bob: Caller 2, you’re a computer nerd geek and everything. What do you think of what he said? Does that approximate what you understand about the cloud and WIFI and that?

Caller 2: Yeah, I actually do, that’s correct. It is moving towards WIFI in the industry as well. So, he’s right.

iON: You’re welcome. It’s not right, we caused it! There was a white knuckle flight, and everybody wanted to go with broadband, broadband was it. Now, even the Ethers aren’t holding. The Ethers aren’t holding. All that money you all spent on CAT 5, you can just throw it in the garbage. Ha! Ha! Ha! We don’t like CAT 5! It won’t hold. Fiber optic isn’t very fibrous.

iON | Vampires & Watchers

Transcribed by Bert.


[18 October 2014, Part 3]:

(1:02:42 mark)
Caller 1: What’s the difference between the vampires and the watchers? Are they also watchers as well or immortal?

iON: Watchers aren’t vampires. Watchers, they are immortal, but they are not vampires. They are watchers.

Caller 1: Are we also watchers?

iON: They are watchers. No, you are not.

Caller 1: OK! Ha! Ha! Ha!

Caller 2: Are they eternal?

Bob: Are the watchers immortal or eternal?

iON: They are immortal.

Bob: Like the vampires, they’re trapped.

iON: Right!

iON | The Cloud

Transcribed by Bert.


[11 October 2014, Part 2]:

(1:20:43 mark)
Caller 1: The cloud replaces our soul?

iON: It already has. It’s keeping better track of you than your soul ever did. It knows what you desire. With your soul, you had to do it before it could log it. This tells you what you desire is to be. There is an app for that.

Caller 2: The cloud short circuits the soul then?

iON: Will! Well, you’re fixing to not need a soul. You just need retrieval. You need a golden retriever.

Caller 1: Did I just hear you say that the cloud defines our desire, and you said before that our desire is our knowing of what we have to do?

iON: Resonant node.

iON | The Soul

Transcribed by Bert.


[11 October 2014, Part 2]:

(15:13 mark)
Caller 1: Is the soul disengaging or changing with this elimination to breath?

iON: It’s going the way of prana.

Bob: Prana, you know, P-R-A-N-A.

Caller: Going the way of prana!

Bob: That’s a good one.

Caller 2: Prana is breath.

Caller 1: Yes, but it’s not the type of breath that's what we think. It’s not connected to the air. It’s kind of mysterious, but that’s interesting. So, that means that we’re at the point now where we’re actually able to control our environment by more exhaling than inhaling? Well, actually we don’t inhale, so...

iON: Do.

Caller: Do?

Bob: He said, “Do”.

iON: Do.

Caller: OK, because that explains – I’ve been experimenting with exhaling in my environment, and it changes everything.

iON: Of course! Your landscape is no longer a mystery. Get the short-handled shovels and bury the five bodies.

iON | Radiant Flux Entity

Transcribed by Bert.


[11 October 2014, Part 2]:

(00:03 mark)
Caller: iON, you said a couple of weeks ago that we are a capacitor in flux.

iON: Flux, yes.

Caller: Do you mean in “flux" as in "a state of flux", continuous change?

iON: No.

Caller: Do you mean as a substance used for helping to melt or join metal?

iON: What’s behind curtain number 3?

Caller: The arrival of a large amount of something.

iON: Yes, number 3.

Caller: Does this have something to do with the living carbon in the iCell?

iON: Yes.

Caller: Which you say is the God particle that we are trying to transform into a transfer, and then once we transform, then we transfer. So, can you talk a little more about that and what’s involved in the transformation that’s the living carbon that’s in our bodies - that’s what is turning our blood into the blood of the lamb?

iON: The radiant energy in a beam of electromagnetic thermal or acoustic radiation passing through a unit normal section per unit time.

Caller: Did you just describe a capacitor?

iON: No, radiant flux entity.

[18 October 2014, Part 3]:

(26:23 mark)
Caller: I had a question about the definition you gave about the “Radiant Flux Entity”.

iON: Yes.

Caller: You said that… well, you gave the definition and it says it’s measured per unit time or passing through a unit normal section per unit time. How does that jive with no time?

iON: It’s the timing. It’s how often it repeats, not as a timed element that would expire. It’s a way to calculate that it is divisible by itself that number of times. Like 2 times 2 is 4, but that has nothing to do with time.