Transcribed by Bert.
[30 January 2016 Part 5]
(33:25 mark)
Caller: What is a planet?
iON: It’s a large, round object in space which travels around a star.
Caller: That is according to whose definition?
iON: Merriam-Webster - we prefer Noah Webster’s, the Lexicographer version, but that’s Merriam- Webster’s conversation.
Caller: You say: “It’s a round sphere that revolves around a star."
iON: Yes, about a star.
Caller: About a star.
iON: No, the “it” revolves - the star revolves around it.
Caller: The star revolves around it.
iON: Yeah, another definition would be: “A celestial body held to influence the fate of human beings."
Caller: Ha! Ha! Ha!
iON: That’s the one you want! No! No, that’s the one you want: “A celestial body held to influence the fate of human beings”. So, that’ll fit everything you’re saying. So, now you can fall off of the world - if you want to - or you don’t have to – you can go to the edge. And then circle the outside of it - and call it a circle - it’s still circular. You can loop into or without it - but without gravity, which is fixing to change – you’re not going to recognize the planets anyway. So, you’re very apropos to question the very validity of all the time-space fields - and the conundrums that doth ensue. So, how very proper for you to not know what the Lampstands are - and know that those Lampstands aren’t on your planet. Very good!
[30 January 2016 Part 5]
(33:25 mark)
Caller: What is a planet?
iON: It’s a large, round object in space which travels around a star.
Caller: That is according to whose definition?
iON: Merriam-Webster - we prefer Noah Webster’s, the Lexicographer version, but that’s Merriam- Webster’s conversation.
Caller: You say: “It’s a round sphere that revolves around a star."
iON: Yes, about a star.
Caller: About a star.
iON: No, the “it” revolves - the star revolves around it.
Caller: The star revolves around it.
iON: Yeah, another definition would be: “A celestial body held to influence the fate of human beings."
Caller: Ha! Ha! Ha!
iON: That’s the one you want! No! No, that’s the one you want: “A celestial body held to influence the fate of human beings”. So, that’ll fit everything you’re saying. So, now you can fall off of the world - if you want to - or you don’t have to – you can go to the edge. And then circle the outside of it - and call it a circle - it’s still circular. You can loop into or without it - but without gravity, which is fixing to change – you’re not going to recognize the planets anyway. So, you’re very apropos to question the very validity of all the time-space fields - and the conundrums that doth ensue. So, how very proper for you to not know what the Lampstands are - and know that those Lampstands aren’t on your planet. Very good!
No comments:
Post a Comment